Trivialities first: Not only are Linkara and Spoony doing a joint review, but there's been a Blake's Seven reference AND a "He tried to kill me with a forklift" song within the space of
ten minutes.
Like I didn't already have a raging fangirl crush on both of them.
Also, while I've been watching bits and pieces of Star Trek: TOS, I hadn't really been making a concerted effort, since over the summer I didn't have much opportunity to watch and this year so far I've been too busy getting my classes and things in order to take up a new fandom.
However, I'm well tempted to take a look at The Next Generation, purely because I've watched the
video review of the
Star Trek: Borg FMV video game (yeah, there was a game; don't act so surprised*) and Q looks
awesome. I mean, he also looks like a smug, insufferable douche, but an
awesome smug insufferable douche, and at least in the game footage John de Lancie looks like he has the time of his life playing him and I always get a kick out of it when I can tell actors are enjoying their roles.
Of course, I have vague memories of watching TNG with my dad when I was very young, and even though I didn't know who the characters were or what they did I remember being very fond of Data and Worf. And Geordi, but I suspect I mostly liked him because he had a cool visor.
So, friends more versed in TNG than I, is Q really that amusing or does he wear a bit thin on the actual show? How much does he even show up? And
does Worf ever get to be as badass as he should be?
And does Geordi have a whole lot of ablism!fail plotlines?*On the subject of video game tie-ins, did you know there was actually
a Doctor Who pinball game? Which seems like one of the most incongruous extensions of a brand I've ever heard of, because, really, it's not like they even made a proper
game out of it (and I think Who would make a nifty point-and-click PC adventure a la King's Quest or Curse of Monkey Island), it's just pinball with the characters pastede on yey.
Although two more minutes on Wikipedia tells me there are also
various games for obscure consoles and/or CD-ROM, which still seem odd and incongruous to me, mostly because I'm hurting my brain trying to imagine Colin Baker or Patrick Troughton in sprite form.
Although, reportedly,
the CD-ROM game has Raston Warrior Robots, which is a substantial point in its favor. It also apparently includes some rather silly-looking clips of Anthony Ainley on a 'shoppy flame background and the posthumous voice of Jon Pertwee, because apparently it wasn't creepy enough when the audios did that.
To go off on a bit of a tangent, I can't be the only one unsettled when the voices of dead actors are used in movies, especially if those actors have been dead for a while (i.e. they didn't die between the end of filming and the release of the movie a la Heath Ledger in
The Dark Knight). I mean, granted, it doesn't happen very often (the only time I remember it happening was "Laurence Olivier" in
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow), and it doesn't quite apply in this situation because Pertwee had agreed to appear in the game before his death (though it's more applicable in the case of
Zagreus) but when I saw it in
Sky Captain all I could think about for the rest of the movie was the Unfortunate Implications.
I mean, Olivier didn't agree to appear in that movie. You don't know he would have had he been alive. (Although hey, doing camp action movies seems to be a Thing for legendary Shakespearean actors, see Exhibit A: Ian McKellan.) If you're an actor of such stature that people would want to use your image, who gets to decide which films you "appear" in? Are you, after your death, to be sold to anyone who pays enough, or will considerations be taken for what sort of work you did and exactly how your image is to be used? Will actors have to start drafting such considerations in their wills, or will that be seen as presumptuous? Of course there are limits to how a dead actor's likeness can be used, as they can't record new reactions or new dialogue, so I can't really believe that using dead actors will be anything beyond a novelty, but it's still creepy.
---
That went on for way longer than I expected. On to the main topic! Also, all generalizations are based on my own experiences and may not apply across all fandoms
Talking with
kindkit recently brought to mind a trend I've noticed in fic; out of all the fic in every fandom I've read, most use either a) first-person POV (which isn't frequent) or b) tight third-person POV, where the narrator is only privy to one character's thoughts and feelings at a time. While I've read some fics that use omniscient POV (either journalistic description-only omniscient POV or an omniscient POV that describes all the characters' thoughts and feelings as appropriate), they're not the majority; most fic only changes POV between scenes if it changes at all.
And I think, because most fic (in my experience) is in that tight third person, a switch in POV within a scene can look like the author slipped up. It reads as messy, or just incorrect, even though I think it's technically valid. I'm curious; do you think that a POV switch within a scene actually
is sloppy? Or are we just so used to reading the single POV at a time that omniscient POV reads wrong?
For that matter, why do most fics go for tight-third-person? For an introspective fic, or a fic about, say, one character specifically reacting to another, the choice is an obvious one, but even in, say, ship-fic, if the thoughts and feelings of every character involved are included, they're included one at a time. Technically, you could include both of their thoughts in the same scene, and in some cases it might actually better serve the fic to do so. Of course, the switching POV also gives the author a convenient location for a scene break.
Do you find you usually write in limited-third-person POV? Any particular reason why? What affects your choice of POV when writing, or where you switch POV if at all? How would a POV switch within a scene read to you?
---
Oh my gracious it is so late. I really must go to bed, like two hours ago.