posted by [identity profile] kayliemalinza.livejournal.com at 04:24am on 03/05/2008
But it's not even the same Evie! And there's no Ardeth Bey at all! And they're jumping on the Ancient Mysterious Chinese People bandwagon that eight zillion films have already done, and I don't consider it The Mummy unless it's in Egypt or Thebes or somewhere like that.

WUT. SRSLY WUT. HOW DO YOU REPLACE EVIE. HOW. DO. YOU. REPLACE. EVIE. ALSO, NEEDS MOAR SAND OMFGPPL. COMMON SENSE.


HARRISON FORD CAN BE INDY IF HE WANTS TO. Besides, the new Indy movie has Cate Blanchett as a Russian dominatrix-type person which makes up for everything. And Karen Allen is back. And the beginning of The Last Crusade was AWESOME. I don't know what you're on about.
NOT IF HE IS PAUNCHY HE CAN'T. OK MAYBE HE CAN AND I'VE BEEN CRUSHING KINDA HARD ON KAREN ALLEN SINCE I WAS LIKE TEN, BUT ISN'T THIS MOVIE ALL ABOUT THEM SITTING IN ROCKING CHAIRS ON A PORCH WHILE THEIR ~SON GOES OFF AND HAS ADVENTURES? NO. YOU DO NOT PUT INDIANA JONES IN A ROCKING CHAIR, BETCH.


I'm sure I have no experience with irrational childhood things but I'll take your word for it, dear. >D
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 08:17pm on 03/05/2008
YOU DON'T REPLACE EVIE. Apparently Rachel Weisz is too big a star or something to be in a Mummy movie. I don't know.

OF COURSE HE WILL NOT BE IN A ROCKING CHAIR. He'll be off being heroic and adventuresome and suchlike, and I'm willing to grant that it will possibly be less awesome that the first three movies but INDIANA JONES WILL NOT BE IN A ROCKING CHAIR.

Feel free to mock me if this ends up being the case, though I may not hear you because I'll be busy demanding my money back.

July

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26 27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31