DAMN IT. : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26 |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
I actually don't remember that conversation at all (so much for me and my love for season 4...), so I don't know exactly how it's phrased, but is there a way to spin it so that it's true in a certain context? He's good at that, after all. CSI Files describes it as "Horatio says twenty years ago, he tried to save his mother's life and the man who killed her ended up dead," so from that it sounds like there's room for a bit of a timegap between the two actions, if you need it. Perhaps there was a sequence where Horatio stepped between them and saved her life that day, but his father killed her shortly thereafter, thus making his attempt to save her a failed one. Stopping now, since I don't know how much I can trust the recap.
It's just, now that you've told me the whole lovely timeline of your version, I forbid you to scrap and rewrite it all. Or at least I really, really urge against it. It's far too intriguing, even in simple summary form.
(no subject)
So, if I don't want to rewrite it (and I don't), that gives me two options: say that Horatio was lying to Stetler, which doesn't seem entirely unreasonable, or just call Little Brothers an AU and cheerfully ignore the conversation entirely.
(no subject)
And as an aside, I am in love that site; thanks for pointing it out.
(no subject)