"Brief" TV reviews, part 1 of 2 : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26 |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
House: I figure it must be like having someone move your furniture around while you’re not looking. Your stuff isn’t supposed to move around unless you know about it! What business does it have wandering back and forth without your consent?
What a great way to put it. It's becoming a tough draw between you and the Television Without Pity recapper in terms of whose analyses I like best.
CSI Miami: I've always been under the assumption that the time last year when he asked Eric for cash to take out Natalia was a foreshadowing hint about his gambling. And while it would have been nice to see a little more leadup, a la Eric prior to the introduction of Marisol, I actually don't mind that it's only been brought up a time or two. All the better to show he's usually able to hide his vice.
SVU: ...yeah, that's pretty much all the stuff I was trying to say last week, only I couldn't get it to come out quite right. I bow before your SVU-reviewing skills.
(no subject)
House: Heh, I don't think I'm anywhere near the same league as the TWOP folks. Reviewing and analyzing House is their job, after all. But I am flattered that you think so. *smile*
CSI: Miami: You know, I'd never thought of that until you brought that up. I assumed it was just Ryan being a cheapskate for whatever reason, or not being particularly careful with his finances. That it might be because of his gambling hadn't even occured to me. That all makes a bit more sense now, thank you. :)