stunt_muppet: (kermit says yay!)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] stunt_muppet at 07:12pm on 10/02/2010 under , ,
So it turns out my Disability and Literature Studies professor is an MST3K fan.

By today we were supposed to have a  topic for our research paper. Because I am a lump, I really did not have one, so I came up with the first thing that I thought of: I'm intrigued by the pulp-horror figure of the "beautiful monster", the female figure who sees herself as disabled, imperfect, or disgusting, but is played by an able-bodied, classically-attractive woman and is still conventionally attractive to both the audience and the male cast - the Bride of Frankenstein, that sort of thing. They generally play on stereotypes of disability - biterness, self-hatred, desire for revenge against the "normate" body, isolation, tragic narrative, etc - without actually making the audience feel for or even observe an extraordinary body. I'm interested in what that says about ideas of feminity, body, and disability, as well as why writers even bother portraying the character as 'disabled', and what narratives that buys into.

The first example that I thought of was from the MST'ed movie "The Brain that Wouldn't Die". I figured if I just threw that movie out there, no one would know what it was, so I first asked if anyone in the room watched Mystery Science Theater, expecting no answer. Imagine my surprise when the professor piped up.

So I mentioned "The Brain that Wouldn't Die", and the victim that the lead character chooses to serve as a substitute body for Jan-in-the-pan; said victim is first seen posing in a fur bikini, and is bitter, isolated, and hates men because of her 'disfigurement' that prevents anyone from loving her. Said 'disfigurement' is a bit of scarring on the side of her face that is mostly covered by her hair and that we don't even see for most of the movie. Now, if the writers had chosen to play up her psychological trauma, that'd be one thing, but they keep referring to her as 'damaged' and her face as unbeautiful. 

When I was finished, my professor laughed and said, "You know, I don't think I've heard anyone talk about 'The Brain that Wouldn't Die' since 1994. MST got me through my graduate thesis."

I laughed as well and responded that it got me through my sophomore year of college, so I knew the feeling. And then I squeed a little bit inside, because it is rather lovely to find people you wouldn't expect with geeky interests.

I'm not sure if I'll keep going with that thesis, because it's more about gender than disability and anyway I'm not sure where I'm going or what I'm trying to prove with it. But it was worth it just to find out my professor watches MST3K.

---

In even more frivolous news, I am most certainly not going to buy the Arcee toy, because I am not the kind of silly person who spends money on plastic toys. My Prowl is different, okay, he is useful for having something sitting by my computer to stare me down and make sure I'm getting my work done, and anyway he was a present. I cannot even justify that purchase to myself on the pretense that femme toys need good sales figures so that Hasbro will keep making them so that the cartoon writers will have to write more ladies, because in the end my paltry consumer dollars are just not going to make that much of an impact. Also, if I bought an Arcee I would feel compelled to buy a Ratchet to keep her company, and then I'm out thirty bucks and kicking myself even harder.

But I am rather entertained by her packaging, in which she is wielding her energy swords like a badass and described in her back-of-box blurb as being "one of the best swordfighters on Cybertron". I realize this has very little to do with her character and more to do with the fact that they have to make her toy super-special-awesome if they want little boys to buy it despite it being pink, but it comforts me somewhat to think that she's really skilled and tough and determined and we just never got to see it.

I am equally entertained by the fact that Cybertron-mode Ratchet comes with defibrillator paddles. I'll bet he zaps people if they backsass him.

brb, writing Arcee a fight scene for that AU I'm always on about. Or, um, doing homework. Yes. Homework, then writing. I must be disciplined.
Mood:: 'amused' amused
Music:: "That's Not My Name" - The Ting Tings
There are 19 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] pimpmytardis.livejournal.com at 12:40am on 11/02/2010
Speaking as a semi-disabled woman, your paper sounds AWESOME. The prof, too.
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 04:11am on 11/02/2010
I'm really fond of the actual topic - the trouble is I don't know where I'm going with it. I feel like the intersections between gender and disability are sort of upfront and there's not a lot of analysis to be made. But then, I haven't looked into extant research, so there are probably points to be made that I haven't thought of yet.

The professor (Dr. F) is so much fun; she's got a lot of enthusiasm for her subject, she knows a whole lot of writers and artists in the field, and she's really good at getting us to lead our own discussions. I'm really glad I took the course.
 
posted by [identity profile] violetisblue.livejournal.com at 12:44am on 11/02/2010
Too cool, paper and prof. And as I remember "Brain That Wouldn't Die" being one of THE most misogynistic films they ever did, good subject matter either way.
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 04:21am on 11/02/2010
I was worried about this seminar being really difficult, especially after some of my other seminars, but this one's a lot of fun, and the professor's a big part of why. She has such verve for her subject. And she has us bring in snacks for class.

I rewatched part of it this evening as a way of refreshing my memory, and god yes. It's even got sleazy saxophone porno music. I didn't think that was ever used unironically.
 
posted by [identity profile] violetisblue.livejournal.com at 05:02am on 11/02/2010
I actually can't much stand to rewatch it because the original movie is so hateful. Same with "The Girl in Lover's Lane," which is basically "Hey, let's all stand around not doing anything about the guy who's stalking and terrifying this nice young lady until he RAPES AND KILLS HER, that'll work out fine, right?" (When the bots are writing fixit fanfic for the movie's ending, you know it was a bad one.)
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 05:34am on 11/02/2010
I haven't seen that one yet (sounds like I'd be giving it a miss, though), but thus far the only one I haven't been able to get through was "Sidehackers". Every character was so unpleasant, and I don't remember if there was actually a rape scene in there but I remember pretty much all the women got killed off and the whole thing was just so *gross*.

My friend can't make it through "Monster a Go Go", but more because of its inexplicable lack of a narrative than any particular unpleasantness.
 
posted by [identity profile] violetisblue.livejournal.com at 05:52am on 11/02/2010
Ugh, "Sidehackers." If you haven't already seen it please skip "The Hellcats" (from the same production team) because besides all of the above there's also a rape scene thrown in apparently for laughs. And they try their best with "The Girl in Lover's Lane," but again when Tom Servo exits the theater going, "I, am, PISSED, OFF," yeah.

I sort of have a soft spot for "Monster a Go-Go" precisely because it has no plot or narrative whatsoever. When they don't even bother trying to poke at the movie itself in the host segments, you know it's awful.
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 02:25am on 12/02/2010
I think I've seen "The Hellcats", but it was a while back, so I'd forgotten the thrown-in rape. And all for the better, too.

Is it strange if I find it sort of sweet whenever Mike/Joel and the bots think something's crossed the line? They do the same thing in "The Brain that Wouldn't Die", too; when Sleazy Guy is trying to seduce someone to use as a spare body Mike comments "Ugh, I don't like this guy anymore." It's like a little reaffirmation of human decency in the face of awful exploitative movies.
 
posted by [identity profile] violetisblue.livejournal.com at 02:27am on 12/02/2010
I actually sort of love it when they all go "BOOOO!" at a woman getting smacked around and other such things. Or Joel going, "I'd like to apologize for the entire male gender now? Thanks, I'm sorry."
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 02:40am on 12/02/2010
Wasn't there the bear-hunting short where they apologize to "everyone, everywhere" for the movie?
 
posted by [identity profile] violetisblue.livejournal.com at 02:43am on 12/02/2010
Followed up by the fantasy host segment where "PETA activist" Joel sets the animals on the Ken-doll hunter. I still can't rewatch the initial short, it's too awful.
 
posted by [identity profile] chickenperson52.livejournal.com at 12:53am on 11/02/2010
...I feel like having Prowl stare at me would make me do more work, too.
I didn't know Arcee was supposed to be badass, although if she was teaching, I guess she'd have to be. Children can be scary.
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 04:41am on 11/02/2010
I always find it easier to work when something - photograph, stuffed toy, figurine - is looking at me. I feel like they can see if I'm slacking off and are scolding me for it. Which is a little strange, but whatever works.

In-story, she probably isn't; I'm sure her combat skills are added on because the target consumer group wouldn't buy a toy of someone who, sum total, got mindwiped, kidnapped, and rescued. But I like to think she was, because it does make me a bit sulky that for two seasons the only female characters were victims and never got to be as competent or active as the guys. Blackarachnia at least gets some combat, but she has to be rescued from her own plans most of the time. Nature of a boy-aimed franchise, I know, but it still makes me feel better if I imagine that the girls are secretly awesome and we just never see it.
 
posted by [identity profile] chickenperson52.livejournal.com at 05:05am on 11/02/2010
Huh. I work less if I think someone's watching. Yeah, the weak females in TFA irritated me too- I was pleasantly surprised by your post.
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 05:45am on 11/02/2010
It's the idea of accountability, for me, but it also used to creep me out to have anyone looking at me.
 
posted by [identity profile] kayliemalinza.livejournal.com at 02:48am on 11/02/2010
I didn't know you were taking Disability and Literature! Are there any good primer articles you can send me? Additionally, anything that could apply to Cap'n Pike?
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 05:11am on 11/02/2010
Hm...the closest I can think of to something related to Pike would be Rosemarie Garland-Thomson's "Shape Structures Story: Fresh and Feisty Stories About Disability", which is primarily looking at feminine narratives but also talks about the quad rugby players in Murderball; the disabled male body is often constructed as emasculated or sexless, because of its embodiment of a difference from the normate body (the normate body is male, thus tying the 'deviation' of disability to the 'deviation' of feminity), and thus in constructing a new narrative of disability, disabled men often present as hypermasculine, athletic, and laddish as a way of destabilizing the extant narrative. I'm not sure how that'd apply to Pike, but given his position of authority it might have some relevance.

I'd also recommend anything by Garland-Thomson (who's done a lot of writing in the field) and Paul Longmore, “Screening Stereotypes: Images of Disabled People in Television and Motion Pictures” as an introductory article. Hope that helps!
 
posted by [identity profile] elycien-xiii.livejournal.com at 04:47am on 11/02/2010
Wow, yeah, Arcee looks awesome. But argh I have already promised myself no more Transformers toys. Come on self. Already bad enough that you caved and bought Blurr last week.

though I will probably break this vow if I find a sufficiently inexpensive Prowl, he's awesome and I want. sucker for marketing? yes, yes I suppose I am.
 
posted by [identity profile] stunt-muppet.livejournal.com at 05:39am on 11/02/2010
I don't know why I want the toys! There's no reason for me to have them! It's not like I have the time to spend setting them up and giving them elaborate adventures! And yet I am so tempted by these plastic figurines. It doesn't make sense!

So don't worry, I'm as much as a marketing sucker as you are. *reposes Prowl figurine*

July

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26 27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31